Use this page to check you're ready to move on.

Review questions

Write your own answer first, then compare it with the model answer.

A Muslim friend says: 'The Bible has been corrupted, but the Quran has been perfectly preserved.' Present the Islamic dilemma from the Quran's own text, state the best Muslim replies fairly, and answer them without a double standard (6-10 sentences).Show answer

The Quran affirms the Torah and Injil and tells the People of the Gospel to judge by what Allah revealed in it (5:47), asks why the Jews come to Muhammad when they have the Torah 'in which is the judgment of Allah' (5:43), tells Muhammad to ask those who read the earlier Scripture (10:94), and says no one can change Allah's words (6:115). If those Scriptures were reliable in the seventh century, they contradict the Quran on the cross, the resurrection and Jesus' sonship; if they were corrupt, the Quran commanded people to judge by a corrupt book. Muslims reply that the true Injil was lost, that 'confirming' means confirming the original, that a variant reading of 5:47 is a purpose clause, and that the Quran is the muhaymin over earlier books (5:48). But the most widely recited reading (Hafs) is a command, the Quran never says the Injil was lost, and Christians in Muhammad's day had the same Gospels found in Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, more than two centuries earlier. Islamic sources themselves describe the Quran's textual history: Uthman's standardisation and burning of other copies (Bukhari 4987), the seven ahruf, the qira'at, the non-Uthmanic lower text of the Sana'a palimpsest, and verses described as abrogated in recitation (Muslim 1452; Bukhari 6829). The point is not that the Quran is hopelessly corrupt but that both books have textual histories, and the New Testament's many uncontrolled manuscripts let us check its text openly.

  • Accurate Quran references for the dilemma (e.g. 5:47, 5:43, 10:94, 6:115)
  • States the dilemma's two horns clearly
  • Represents Muslim replies fairly (lost Injil, musaddiq, variant reading, muhaymin)
  • Accurate account of the Quran's textual history from Islamic sources
  • Avoids double standards and stays respectful
Your Muslim colleague says: 'Tawhid is pure monotheism. The Trinity is three gods, and the Quran rightly condemns it.' Explain in 6-10 sentences how the Trinity differs from what the Quran describes, and how you would compare it with tawhid.Show answer

Begin by agreeing that God is one (Deuteronomy 6:4; Mark 12:29) and that three gods would be blasphemy; Christians are monotheists. The Quran rejects saying Allah is 'the third of three' (5:73), pictures Jesus and his mother taken as two gods besides Allah (5:116), and rejects a son through a consort (6:101), which looks like a Father-Mother-Son triad that Christians also reject. The Trinity confesses one God, one divine being, eternally existing as three persons, Father, Son and Holy Spirit: one 'what' and three 'whos', so it is not a contradiction. Tawhid holds that God is one being and one person; the question is what kind of oneness is true. The Quran calls Allah al-Wadud, the Loving (85:14), so ask whom a single-person God loved before creation; in the Trinity the Father loved the Son before the foundation of the world (John 17:24), so God is love in himself. Sunni theology's eternal, uncreated speech of Allah already admits an eternal distinction within God, pointing towards the eternal Word who was with God and was God (John 1:1, 14). 'Son' is not biological but speaks of shared nature and relationship. Ask these as questions, and invite your friend to read John's Gospel.

  • Affirms monotheism and rejects three gods
  • Shows the Quran's description (5:73; 5:116; 6:101) differs from the Trinity
  • Defines Trinity accurately (one being, three persons)
  • Compares kinds of oneness, using love (85:14; John 17:24) or eternal speech
  • Explains 'Son of God' as non-biological, gently and invitingly
A dawah preacher argues: 'Muhammad is the prophet like Moses in Deuteronomy 18:18, from the brothers of Israel; and since no prophet like Moses arose in Israel (Deuteronomy 34:10), it can't be Jesus. He is also the Paraclete of John 14.' Answer in 6-10 sentences from the texts.Show answer

Deuteronomy 18:15 says the prophet will come 'from among you, from your brothers', and the book uses 'brothers' for fellow Israelites, as in 17:15 for the king and 18:2 for the other tribes. Deuteronomy 34:10 looks back from the close of the Torah: none like Moses had arisen yet, which keeps the promise open for a future prophet from Israel rather than moving it to another nation. Verses 10-12 also mark Moses by face-to-face knowledge of God and public signs and wonders; the Quran says Muhammad was not given signs on demand (17:90-93), and while Muslims point to the Quran as his sign (29:50-51), the Gospels report public signs by Jesus. The New Testament applies the passage to Jesus (Acts 3:22-26). In John 14-16 Jesus names the Helper as the Holy Spirit (14:26), the Spirit of truth whom the world cannot see and who dwells in the disciples and stays with them forever (14:16-17), who came at Pentecost and glorifies Jesus (16:14). No Greek manuscript reads periklytos. The Gospel of Barnabas, which does name Muhammad, is a late medieval work.

  • 'Brothers' means Israelites (18:15; 17:15; 18:2)
  • Correct reading of 34:10-12
  • Signs point to Jesus; Acts 3:22-26
  • Paraclete is the Holy Spirit (John 14:16-17, 26; 16:14)
  • No manuscript reads periklytos; Barnabas is late
Your Muslim friend says: 'Allah is merciful; I hope He will accept my good deeds. Isn't it arrogant to say you know you're going to Paradise?' Write the 6-10 sentences you would say, representing Islam fairly and presenting the gospel clearly.Show answer

Affirm what is true: Islam stresses Allah's mercy (39:53), and a hadith in Bukhari says no one enters Paradise by deeds alone without Allah's mercy, so Islam is not merely a works religion. Yet deeds are weighed on the scales (7:8-9), Muslims are taught to live between hope and fear, and the Quran has Muhammad say, 'I do not know what will be done with me or with you' (46:9; compare Bukhari 1243). Mercy without atonement also raises a question: how can a just God simply overlook sin? Explain that Christian assurance is not confidence in ourselves but in Christ: he bore our sin so that God is 'just and the justifier' of the one who has faith in Jesus (Romans 3:26), and he rose from the dead. We are saved by grace through faith, not works, so no one can boast (Ephesians 2:8-9), and that is why John writes so that believers 'may know' they have eternal life (1 John 5:13). Grace is not licence; good works are the fruit of salvation, not its root (Romans 6:1-2). Call your friend, gently, to repent and believe (Mark 1:15), and invite them to read a Gospel together.

  • Represents Islamic mercy and the scales fairly with references
  • Uses 46:9 or Bukhari 1243 accurately on assurance
  • Explains justice and mercy meeting at the cross (Romans 3:26)
  • Shows assurance rests on Christ, so it is humble, not arrogant
  • Clear call to repent and believe, warmly expressed

Capstone task

Write a 600-word opening statement for a public, respectful Christian-Muslim dialogue on the question: 'Is Jesus the Son of God who died for our sins?' Your statement should honour what Muslims believe about Jesus, use the Quran's own testimony to the earlier Scriptures (the Islamic dilemma), present historical evidence for the crucifixion, explain the Trinity and Jesus' self-claims accurately, and end with the gospel of grace and assurance.

Hand this in to Mr Scott. He will look for:

  • Represents Islamic beliefs about Jesus accurately and respectfully, with Quran references
  • Uses the Islamic dilemma correctly (e.g. 5:47, 10:94, 6:115) and anticipates the tahrif response
  • Presents accurate historical evidence for the crucifixion against 4:157
  • Explains the Trinity and 'Son of God' clearly and supports Jesus' deity from his own words and actions
  • Avoids double standards on textual history and avoids mocking Muhammad or Muslims
  • Closes with a clear, warm presentation of grace and assurance in Christ

Watch and discuss

Debates on the nature of God: Trinity and tawhid

Debate · Nabeel Qureshi vs Shabir Ally

A former Muslim and a leading Muslim debater on the nature of God, with real mutual respect.

Watch for:

  • How does Qureshi explain the Trinity to Muslims?
  • What is Ally's strongest objection?
  • How do they treat each other?

Find it on YouTube

Is the New Testament We Possess Today Inspired?

Debate · James White vs Shabir Ally, 2006

The corruption (tahrif) charge debated in detail.

Watch for:

  • How does White use the Quran's own statements about the Injil?
  • What textual arguments does Ally raise?
  • Note how manuscript evidence is used on both sides.

Find it on YouTube

The Islamic Dilemma

Talk · David Wood

The argument from Lesson 2 of the Islam module, explained by the apologist who popularised it.

Watch for:

  • State the dilemma in two sentences.
  • Which Quran verses does Wood use?
  • What Muslim responses does he anticipate?

Find it on YouTube

Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus

Testimony · Nabeel Qureshi

Qureshi's story: why friendship and patient evidence mattered more than winning arguments.

Watch for:

  • What role did his friend David play?
  • What evidence moved him most?
  • What did it cost him?

Find it on YouTube